NFL Owners Will Address Browns Situation In Boston This Week

Haslam

Browns owner Jimmy Haslam‘s Pilot Flying J company is being investigated by the government for a scheme involving diesel fuel rebate fraud.

Many have expressed concerns that Haslam’s legal issues will impact his ability to continue to own the team. Haslam has taken a “regretful and apologetic” stance in his talks with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

When the NFL owners meet this week in Boston Haslam’s legal problems are expected to be addressed.

Don Banks of Sports Illustrated reports the NFL has said it would not ask Haslem to step aside while the investigation continues, but Haslem is believed to have three or four family members with a stake in the team’s ownership, and could deal with a suspension or a recusal by temporarily transferring the team to either one of his two grown daughters, or perhaps even his 82-year-old father, Jim Haslam, the founder and patriarch of the family business and a still very-active former University of Tennessee football player and member of the school’s 1951 national championship team.

The NFL is also not ready to lump Haslam’s legal plight in with that of a former NFL owner, ex-49ers owner Eddie DeBartolo Jr., who pled guilty to a federal felony charge of bribing former Louisiana governor, Edwin Edwards in 1998, receiving two years of probation, a $1 million fine and a year’s suspension from then-NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue.

The key distinction in how the NFL views the two cases at this point is this, league sources say: DeBartolo was involved in an individual criminal matter, as opposed to being found responsible for a corporate act of illegality, as Haslam would seem to face.

DeBartolo admitted to his role in the bribery, and even voluntarily recused himself from control of the 49ers in December 1997, just before being indicted by a federal grand jury. Haslam has repeatedly proclaimed his innocence and maintains the rebate fraud was the act of a small group of rogue employees who bent the rules for their own financial gain.

He has promised to make restitution with interest to companies who have been cheated, and to put in place a chief compliance officer to restructure and oversee the company’s rebate program.

But for now, at least according to league and team sources, the idea of Haslam having to change his long-term status in team ownership in reaction to the fraud case seems unlikely.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Enjoyed this post?
Subscribe to Browns Gab via RSS Feed or E-mail and receive daily news updates from us!

Submit to Digg  Stumble This Story  Share on Twitter  Post on Facebook  Post on MySpace  Add to del.icio.us  Bark It Up  Submit to Reddit  Fave on Technorati

3 Responses to “NFL Owners Will Address Browns Situation In Boston This Week”

  1. dale says:

    This whole investigation may just be more of the same from the Obamanites! The Haslam family has given loads of money to the GOP for years making them a target of the Obama administration! The whole IRS scandal as far as going after tea party and other conservative groups might be just part of a bigger wider operation by this crooked band of federal government criminals!

    • Denolakes says:

      OK. Take a deep breath and relax. The IRS also targeted some liberal groups, too. This is football. And Pilot J is in a fraud investigation that looks like it has some pretty serious legs. The company improperly withheld millions of $$ of rebates that it had already agreed with smaller carriers — many of whom have already filed their own lawsuits — to just so some sales lackeys could pad their income. Same mentality as the Enron traders. Sounded just like ‘em on tape, too. Just ’cause the sheriff who caught you is a member of the opposite political party doesn’t mean you weren’t stealing the loot. Any way you look at it, this is not a good thing for Pilot J or Mr. Haslam. It doesn’t mean it is fatal to his ownership or that he is necessarily a bad guy personally. But, something got out of control — and he is the CEO, so there is going to be responsibility on him — maybe not criminally, but certainly reflects on his managerial capabilities and oversight, or lack thereof, donchathink?

Leave a Reply